When a parking lot is being constructed, one of the most important questions that are asked is whether asphalt or concrete should be used in order to construct the ground on which cars will be parked. Overall, concrete seems to be the better option for a variety of reasons. First of all, concrete is a lot more durable than asphalt. Hence, you would be able to open your parking lot to heavier vehicles that you might not have been able to manage otherwise.
You can also withstand a heavier flow of cars when you have a concrete parking lot. This is important because of the fact that in order to be profitable a parking lot will have to facilitate as many cars as possible. The fact that concrete is more durable also means less maintenance work. Asphalt cracks easily, and whenever a crack forms you will have to get rid of it as quickly as possible. This means extra costs every so often which will not be incurred if you lay concrete instead.
Concrete parking lots are also very easy to clean. The smooth surfaces are less likely to trap dust and debris unlike the invariably pockmarked surfaces of asphalt. Hence, since car park sweeping is easier it will have to be done less often which once again will end up saving you quite a bit of money.
A lot of people opt for asphalt because of the fact that it is cheaper than concrete, but it is cheaper for a reason. Asphalt is less durable and tougher to clean, and will often end up incurring heavier costs down the line which will mitigate the money you might have saved during the initial stages when you first invested in your parking lot.